“We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” – Ronald Reagan
The quote from Ronald Reagan is an excerpt from a letter that should be read by every American citizen with a patriotic bone in their body. A Canary in a Coal Mine-GOP Letter Side 1 rev 1.0 – Letter from the Missoula County Republican Central Committee and the Gallatin County Republican Women.
* * *
President Trump knows: Mail-in ballots must go away!
On Monday, August 18, 2025, Newsmax wrote:
Trump Pledges End to Mail-In Ballots, Voting Machines Ahead of 2026 Midterms | Newsmax.com
Naturally, absentee ballots with legitimate excuses, such as UOCAVA, will always need to be kept in place.
Unfortunately, President Trump is fed so many different ideas of ‘solutions’ it must be hard for him to discern what the best ways of attacking the problem of corrupt elections are. Would, for example, watermarked ballots on secure paper solve the problem? Only if there is technology in place to detect the correct water marks (While counting votes?/If forensic audits are even allowed in order to analyze the paper ballots?). Needless to say, if voter rolls still include ineligible ‘voters’, even watermarked legal ballots will be voted illegally.
In the following interview some good points were made:
🔥Trump makes HUGE Announcement!
* * *
AI used to analyze claims
Algorithms are blamed for what is happening in our elections. AI has a view on how likely the algorithm presented as being used in Montana elections using census data, voter rolls and cast vote records.
Anyone with common sense can see, though, that elections are manipulated. A brilliant mathematician, Ed Solomon, can show the equation for how, in Maricopa AZ in 2020, nefarious actors were able to calculate how to keep the footrace of elections going to help the outcome look plausible, as well as the number of ballots needed as a backfill. His work was based on the paper ballots as imaged for the full forensic audit and data provided by the election administrators. He has since shown proof of manipulation in other counties, such as Arapahoe in Colorado.
Mike Lindell lost the case against him in the defamation suit brought by Eric Coomer. Lindell had no way of proving that “the machines did it”, or that the claims made about Coomer were true. The “experts” he has relied on were not there to testify, since the packet captures never were real and the polynomial math claims do not hold water either. This will likely hurt any election integrity movement in their future efforts.
Success in courts always comes down to physical evidence: the paper ballots, voter registrations, chain-of-custody documents, transaction receipts, etc. Which is why (?) every measure has been taken over the years to suppress such evidence. Hopefully, President Trump will be able to have that evidence assessed by a court soon. In the meantime, the material related to the only full forensic audit that has ever been allowed to happen (Maricopa, AZ) is held in appropriate chain of custody by Jovan Hutton Pulitzer.
June 21, 2025
* * *
Step taken towards added election integrity
Bulletin sent out February 28, 2025, regarding letter signed by 21 Secretaries of State.
* * *
Bill Lussenheide Sr Steps up to the Plate!
* * *
The PSYOP That Kept Us from Correcting the Maladministered Elections
Lindell’s PCAPs: Part of a PSYOP – Deeper Dive!
* * *
What Happened With Early Votes in 2020?
What the full forensic audit revealed. Pressed for time? Start at minute mark 39:50.
Let’s Talk About Our Country! Will America Survive? (rumble.com)
A Blast from the Past: Millions of Mail Ballots Made It Impossible to Track Which Ballots Were Being Tabulated
(Central City News Nov. 19, 2020)
* * *
Blurred Boundaries
What is actually right? Is “motor voter” a good system for safe and secure elections? Renewing your driver license with Montana MVD, you are asked whether you’d like to register to vote. Check a box for whether you are a citizen or not. Honor system? A migrant was seen picking up a fistful of voter registrations at an MVD office. Can all the registrations be reliably verified for nationality before the elections? Maybe this system should be ended? How? A TRO describing the damages you suffer as a voter when people whose citizenship has not been sufficiently verified are allowed to register to vote/ballots are sent out without sufficient verification? How do we know that only verified citizens are on the voter rolls?
CISA has sounded the alarm that a cyberattack may happen on election day. Did the federal government listen to concerns expressed by We the People after the 2020 elections? The head of CISA at the time claimed that the elections were the safest ever. Is that what has been evidenced? Or was evidence of maladministration suppressed? So, what may be the reason for the alarm? Is the federal government now concerned that our voices may not be heard? It just seems interesting that this alarm pushes people into early voting, maybe signing up for mail ballots, which are the main problem pointed at by election integrity teams. Discernment is truly needed at every turn… Either way, we are lucky to be relying on paper ballots at Lake County polling locations! A cyberattack can’t change what is on paper.
* * *
Do what you can to help make elections TOO BIG TO RIG. When some are flooding the voting “market” with votes in numbers that are hard to verify, you can, for example, offer a ride to people that may have troubles making it to the elections office or their polling station. We MUST counter any attempts to disenfranchise legitimate voters. Our local thinker points to new questionable processes: “Newest […] ploy to overcome legal voting: harvest the Americans’ overseas ballots. Trying to ‘count’ 9 million mail-ins, while the state department only knows of 2.8 million Expats… Given 0 IDs, 0 signatures, all ‘mailed in’ by Email. It resurrects much of the 2020 tactics to flood the zone.” – Voicing concerns, rightfully so, without needing to be called a conspiracy theorist, considering evidence that has been brought to light over the years. In addition, the 1st Amendment is still in place, which gives citizens the right to voice concerns!
* * *
Reasons why ballot initiative CI-128 should have been rejected:
Abortion is already legal in Montana. This initiative makes unfettered abortions constitutional. Hopefully, those who worked hard to open the eyes of the voters on this messy initiative will find a way to still keep it from having its downstream effects…
- backed by Planned Parenthood and liberal groups;
- represented legally by former Democratic Governor’s chief legal counsel — who is also running to be Montanans’ Lt Governor;
- hired out-of-state signature gatherers;
- opponents say the language is “vague and could have serious downstream effects”.
* * *
The Threat of Ranked Choice Voting Averted – for NOW
On her Facebook account (FOLLOW her!), Jennifer Fielder, our candidate re-elected to the Public Service Commission shared a very good analogy of how Ranked Choice Voting might work in your case:
Montana CI-126/127. Here’s a simple illustration to explain why I will be voting NO.
A group of 100 people vote on dessert. The choices are:
- Brownies
- Apple Pie
- Brussel sprouts
- Peas
The votes come in:
49 people vote for Brownies, 24 in favor of Apple Pie,
17 in favor of Brussel Sprouts, and
10 for Peas.
Peas are out, but all 10 of those voters chose Brussel Sprouts as their 2nd choice, so the next tally is 49 for Brownies, 27 for Brussel Sprouts, and 24 for Apple Pie. Now Apple Pie is out, but as luck would have it all of the Apple Pie voters had Peas as their 2nd choice, but since Peas was already eliminated it went to their 3rd place vote which was, you guessed it, Brussel Sprouts.
Our final tally:
Brussel Sprouts 51
Brownies 49.
The 49 Brownies lovers hate Brussel Sprouts and chose them as their 4th place pick, but they like Apple Pie and chose it as their 2nd place pick. The 17 people who chose Brussel sprouts as their 1st place vote all had Brownies as their 2nd choice, but since Brussel Sprouts was never eliminated those 2nd place votes were never tallied.
So Brownies, with 49 1st place votes, 17 2nd place votes and only 24 4th place votes, loses to Brussel Sprouts that won 17 1st place votes, 10 2nd place votes, 24 3rd place votes and 49 4th place votes. But Apple Pie also had 73 1st and 2nd choice votes. The only people really happy in this scenario are the 17 people that really really like Brussel Sprouts, and maybe 10 more that think they’re “ok”.
Does a system that allows for this possibility sound like a good system? Brownies won 66 1st and 2nd place votes while Brussel sprouts only got 27 1st and 2nd place votes. And poor Apple Pie received 73 1st and 2nd place votes and eliminated in the 2nd round!
RCV fails to consider 2nd choice preferences for the last eliminated and the winner, giving more weight to fewer 2nd or 3rd choices.
This is why people say that ranked choice voting is unfair
It counts SOME people’s 2nd, 3rd, or 4th place votes while not counting others. Furthermore, in the final tally, one person’s begrudging 3rd or 4th place vote CARRIES JUST AS MUCH WEIGHT as another person’s 1st place preference.
Brussel sprouts for dessert?? Umm… No thank you! Let the best candidate win!
THANKFULLY, MONTANA VOTED NO on Cl-126/127!
In other words:
Montanans do not want open primaries where those who are not even registered Republicans may vote for the most left leaning Republican candidate to possibly stop the most conservative from winning. We want the candidate who receives the greatest number of votes to be the winner!
* * *
Are Alternate Electors False?
Google is clearly pushing to paint a certain picture. Interestingly, a very liberal pundit once described the electoral system in the following way:
