Welcome

hischosenfoxes@protonmail.com

Candidates Running for Election 2022

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. ~John Adams

founders
Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism who should labour to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and citizens. The mere Politician, equally with the pious man ought to respect and to cherish them. 

Divine Virtue That Serves People and Safeguards Nations

Montana Secretary of State Candidates for 2022

MT Republican vs Democrat seats for 2022 Election

Source: Montana Free Press

MONTANA SUPREME COURT:
Supreme Court justices in Montana serve eight-year terms.

Incumbent Supreme Court  Justice #1  Jim Rice 
(The court’s longest-serving member with 20 years on the bench)
Ballotpedia Report on Jim Rice

Challenger: Bill D’Alton  (a Billings attorney)
D’Alton is a personal injury lawyer who’s practiced in Montana since 1995 and operated his own firm since 2008, where he represents plaintiffs and defendants in civil and criminal cases. He has not previously held or run for public office. 
Both contenders will automatically proceed to the GENERAL ELECTION.

Incumbent Supreme Court  Justice #2  Ingrid Gustafson
Gustafson was appointed to the court by former Gov. Steve Bullock and was elected to retain the seat in 2018. Gustafson has previously served as chief judge of the 13th Judicial District in Yellowstone County.  She is widely recognized among Montana lawyers and judges for pursuing court reforms, and judicial training for child abuse and neglect cases. Ballotpedia Report on Ingrid Gustafson

Challenger:  Helena judge Michael McMahon  (5 years on the district court) 
McMahon has a track record as a private defense attorney and experienced civil litigator licensed in Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota. He ran against and unseated Helena District Court Judge Deeann Cooney in 2016 and successfully retained that seat in 2018. As a member of the district court, McMahon handles criminal and civil cases as well as adult treatment cases within family court.

Challenger:  Helena attorney James Brown
(Current member of the state Public Service Commission)
Brown, who was born in Dillon, was elected to the PSC in 2020. He runs the James Brown Law Office in Helena, where he litigates water law and public land issues and practices estate planning. Brown became well known in state political circles for representing American Tradition Partnership, a conservative political group found to have violated campaign finance laws in 2013. In what some political observers say was an atypical move for a Supreme Court race, Gov. Greg Gianforte, U.S. Sen. Steve Daines and Attorney General Austin Knudsen, all Republicans, delivered a joint endorsement of Brown’s candidacy.

Independent Article: Jim Brown

More info regarding the CURRENT MT Supreme Court

US HOUSE DISTRICT #1

US HOUSE DISTRICT #2

  • Representative Matt Rosendale (R)
  • Charles Walking Child (R)
  • James Boyette (R)
  • Kyle Austin (R)
  • Mark Sweeney (D)
  • Penny Ronning (D)
  • Skylar Williams (D)
  • Roger Roots (Libertarian)
  • Sam Rankin (Libertarian)
  • Samuel Thomas (Libertarian)

Gary Buchanan (Independent)

PUBLIC COMMISSION SEATS
Montana’s Public Service Commission is a five-member body, that regulates investor-owned utility companies in Montana.

DISTRICT #1

  • District 1 Incumbent Commissioner Randy Pinocci (R)
  • Challenger: K. Webb Galbreath of Browning (R)
  • Challenger: Arlo Christianson (R)

DISTRICT #5

  • Incumbent Johnson (Terms out this year)
  • Derek Skees (R)
  • Joe Dooling (R)
  • Ann Bukacek (R)
  • Dean Crabb (R)
  • Kevin Hamm (D)
  • John Repke (D)

Source: MTFP

Precinct Captains

You are making a much need difference in the lives of many! THANK YOU!!
Republican Precinct Committee Persons
  Committee Women Committee Men
ARL 1 Laura Andres Shawn Andres
BEA 1 Marylee Syme  Douglas Syme
BEA 2    
CHA 1 Sjaan Vincent  
DAY 1 Linda Sauer Ron C Tjaden
FER 1 Marcie Truckey Brian Truckey
PAB 1 Tammy Baer Dan Salomon
PAB 2 Susan Lake Mauri Morin
POL 1 Cynthia J Waterman Freeman Robinson
POL 2 Sherry Nelson Fred Nelson
POL 3 Mary Mutch Frank Mutch
POL 4    
POL 5 Dorothy Ashcraft Larry Ashcraft
POL 6    
POL 7 Julie Reffner Jeff Nelson
POL 8    
RON 1 Ellen Wickland  
RON 2 Jill Read Joe Read
STI 1 Michal Delgado Frank Delgado
STI 2 Sheila Larssons Andy Larssons
SWA 1    
SWA 2 Debbie Berkley Tom Berkley

Political Signage

USA First Free Stock Photo - Public Domain Pictures
FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF POLITICAL PRACTICES

POLITICAL SIGNS

Commissioner of Political Practices

Information on Political Signs

What is the COPP’s role with political signs? And what are the disclaimer requirements for political signs? 
(see the below information as a PDF)

When it comes to political signs, the COPP has jurisdiction only in upholding and enforcing ATTRIBUTION requirements. In other words, the only oversight over political signs that the COPP has is in ensuring the required “paid for by” attribution message is included, and that the expense is disclosed fully in a campaign finance report.

The COPP does not have oversight over when citizens may begin to display political signs or when those signs must be taken down.

Click here for Information on ‘PAID FOR BY’, what it must include, FAQ, and  Updated Non-Attributed Material

Attribution Information:  All election and electioneering communications are legally required to include attribution that identifies the entity that paid for the communication.

All paid campaign materials meant to support a candidate or ballot issue must include a “paid for by” attribution message disclosing the entity that financed the material. This includes—but is not limited to—campaign mailers, radio ads, yard signs, boosted Facebook or Instagram posts, etc. The ‘PAID FOR BY’ message must be large enough to be readable, and must identify the entity who financed the communication, and their listed mailing address. Attribution requirements vary between candidates and committees. For more information, familiarize yourself with attribution requirements and how to report paid political communications.

If the material is too small for the disclaimer to be included (e.g. with a text, keychain, etc.), a copy of the material and the attribution information must be sent to the COPP to be approved for use to avoid potential campaign practices complaints. This information is publicly accessible on the COPP’s website. For more details on non-attributed campaign communications, review this information. More guidance on  the “paid for by” attribution requirements is available on the COPP’s website.

See Mont. Code Ann 13-25-225 and 44.11.601(2) ARM for the full attribution requirements and applicability.

What is the role of local government in determining political sign timelines? (e.g. when signs can go up and must be taken down?)

The Office of Political Practices often receives phone inquiries regarding the timeline for placing political signs. As stated above, the COPP has no jurisdiction over when political signs may be displayed, and does not know the specific requirements for each Montana municipality. Local governments (I.e. a city council or county commission) are responsible for regulating when political signs may be placed and when they must be taken down.  Contact your local city or county government for more information.

The Montana Department of Transportation is responsible for sign regulations along Montana roadways or right of way (see the below information for more details).

What is the role of the Montana Department of Transportation (MTDOT) in regulating the placement of political signs on Montana roadways? 

(This information comes from a 2012 notices from the MTDOT’s Right of Way Bureau)

Political campaign committees, and candidates are being reminded again about restrictions on where their signs can be placed. Signs on highway fences, utility poles, and otherwise on state right of way are not allowed and are being removed by Department of Transportation crews.

With landowner’s consent, political signs may be placed alongside the highway on privately owned land. Many signs are being placed in ditches or on the highway side of fences. State crews must remove them and store them until the owners can pick them up. Candidates, and their supporters should make sure their signs are placed on private property.

Federal law requires that any sign intended to be read from the highway must be regulated by the state. In Montana, as in other states, controlling signs is the responsibility of the Department of Transportation. Failure to control signs brings the threat of federal sanctions and can disrupt highway improvement projects.

It is unsafe, and illegal to drive or park in a ditch along a highway to install a sign on private property. Within 30 days following the applicable election the signs should be removed.

The candidates’ cooperation in adhering to the regulations, and statutes will benefit the Department of Highways, and the taxpayers of Montana.

Contact information:

What guidance do the Administrative Rules of Montana offer on political signs? (see 18.6.246, ARM)

(1) Signs promoting political candidates or issues shall be placed on private property only and cannot be placed without the permission of the property owner. Political signs must comply with sign standards found in 75-15-113, MCA, and ARM 18.6.231, unless otherwise specified in this rule.

(2) Political signs must not:

(a) be placed on or allow any portion to intrude in the public right-of-way or on public property; and

(b) be placed within 100 feet of any entrance to the building in which a polling place is located.

(3) Political signs will not be considered in determining the spacing required between conforming off-premises outdoor advertising signs.

(4) Political signs must be removed within 14 days following the applicable election. The department shall notify the landowner of illegal signs which are not removed within 14 days. The signs shall be removed by the department 24 hours after notification to the landowner. The department shall retain removed political signs for five working days after notification of removal before their destruction. The sign owner may retrieve the signs during this period.

(5) Signs that pose a traffic hazard may be removed by the department without prior notification to the sign owner.

(6) Political signs do not require permits and are not subject to permit fees.

History: 75-15-121, MCA; IMP, 75-15-111, MCA; NEW, 1996 MAR p. 1855, Eff. 7/4/96; AMD, 2008 MAR p. 2476, Eff. 11/27/08; AMD, 2012 MAR p. 185, Eff. 1/27/12; AMD, 2016 MAR p. 1440, Eff. 8/20/16.